There are often questions about the laws on recording conversations between parties, and most often, whether both parties need to be aware that a conversation is being recorded. The short answer is that it depends. The law varies by state as to whether both parties need to be notified when a conversation is being recorded. Thirty-eight states, including Iowa, Nebraska, and South Dakota are one-party consent states – which means one party has the right to record a conversation without getting consent from the other.
- Iowa Code Ann. § 808B.2(2)(c) – An individual may record or disclose the contents of an oral, electronic, or telephonic communication if they are a party to the conversation, or if any party to the conversation has consented to the recording.
- Neb. Rev. Stat. § 86-290(2)(c) – It is not unlawful for an individual who is a party to a conversation, or an individual with consent from a party to a conversation, to record an in-person or electronic communication, so long as it is not done so for the purpose of committing a crime or a tort.
- S.D. Codified Laws § 23A-35A-20 – It is not unlawful for an individual who is a party to a conversation, or an individual with consent from a party to a conversation, to record the contents of that communication.
Keep in mind that because these are states laws, there are different laws at play when it comes to interstate or multi-state phone calls. When parties of the conversation are in different states, the law that applies will vary. Although a large majority of states allow one-party consent, it may be the case that a state with all-party consent is the law that applies. Additionally, federal laws may apply – like federal wiretapping, or laws that apply to eavesdropping.
Questions? Contact our Sioux City, Sioux Falls, or Omaha office today.
Let Us Know What You Thought about this Post.
Put your Comment Below.