February 10, 2014. The Eighth Circuit has ruled against pharmaceutical giant Novartis in a lawsuit brought by the estate of a woman who acquired a degenerative bone disease after taking two cancer drugs, Aredia and Zometa. According to the Eighth Circuit, Novartis failed to warn about the links between the drugs and osteonecrosis, a disease which essentially leads to bone death due to poor blood supply. In the case, Winter v. Novartis, the deceased woman acquired osteonecrosis in her jaw after having two teeth extracted. The jury awarded her estate $225,000 in compensatory damages but did not award any punitive damages. One of the key issues on appeal was whether New Jersey or Missouri law applied to the plaintiff’s claim for punitive damages. If New Jersey law applied (Novartis is a New Jersey corporation), no punitive damages could be awarded. However, if Missouri law applied (the injury occurred in Missouri, to a Missouri resident), punitive damages could be awarded. While the jury did not award any punitive damages, Novartis argued that the evidence submitted to the jury on the punitive damages claim tainted the jury’s review of other issues. The Eighth Circuit disagreed, ruling that Missouri law governed the issue because Missouri’s interest in protecting its citizens from injury, and related interest in deterring harmful conduct by foreign manufacturers doing business in Missouri, outweighed New Jersey’s interest in having its corporations governed by New Jersey’s punitive damages laws. A copy of the Eighth Circuit’s opinion can be found here.

Goosmann Law can be contacted by emailing info@goosmannlaw.com or by calling 712.226.4000. We are ready to serve your legal needs.

Subscribe Our Blog

DISCLAIMER: The information in this blog post (“post”) is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect the current law in your jurisdiction. By visiting this website, blog, or post you understand that there is no attorney client relationship between you and the Goosmann Law Firm attorneys and website publisher. No information contained in this post should be construed as legal advice from Goosmann Law Firm, PLC, or the individual author, nor is it intended to be a substitute for legal counsel on any subject matter. No reader of this post should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any information included in, or accessible through, this Post without seeking the appropriate legal or other professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances at issue from a lawyer licensed in the recipient’s state, country or other appropriate licensing jurisdiction.