Click here to see the full video interview with Jeana Goosmann: http://bit.ly/2s5xG2e

The headline making BPI and ABC "Pink Slime" defamation case was estimated to last about eight weeks, but ultimately settled in nearly four.
Jeana Goosmann stated, "Most cases... they do tend to settle, it's just a matter of at what point you settle out of the case. 

The agreement relays, "Plaintiffs' claims against Defendants American Broadcasting Companies Inc. and Jim Avila shall be dismissed with prejudice..." With the settlement ultimately being finalized by signatures on agreement documents. The trial began with opening statements on June 5.

"Once you dismiss a case with prejudice, the case is completely over and you can't bring the claims ever again," said Goosmann.

Goosmann says the agreement documents the Union County Courthouse released are bare bones; standard in a high-profile case with a large sum of money on the line. 

"We'll never know what the exact terms are and there's really no way to find out, because it's between private parties and they've agreed to keep it confidential. It is most likely that both sides most likely lost time and money going forward with the trial, but sometimes it's worth going the distance and applying pressure across the aisle," said Goosmann.

"It's a way to mitigate the risk on both sides," said Goosmann. "So, waiting for the jury to make the decision is always one of the riskier moves, because you're putting your fate in the hands of the jury, versus if the parties come to an agreement on what the terms should be, you have some input and control into that."

Goosmann says the monetary value and other details in the agreement won't be released, unless both parties choose to do so.

To read more about the case check out our blog! http://blog.goosmannlaw.com/trial-lawyer-on-you-side/breaking-news-sd-based-bpi-reaches-settlement-in-high-stakes-pink-slime-defamation-suit-with-abc

CONTACT US

Subscribe Our Blog

DISCLAIMER: The information in this blog post (“post”) is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect the current law in your jurisdiction. By visiting this website, blog, or post you understand that there is no attorney client relationship between you and the Goosmann Law Firm attorneys and website publisher. No information contained in this post should be construed as legal advice from Goosmann Law Firm, PLC, or the individual author, nor is it intended to be a substitute for legal counsel on any subject matter. No reader of this post should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any information included in, or accessible through, this Post without seeking the appropriate legal or other professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances at issue from a lawyer licensed in the recipient’s state, country or other appropriate licensing jurisdiction.