A recent case in Indiana emphasizes that an employer must carefully consider how its actions will affect a non-competition agreement with its employees. Nightingale Home Healthcare, Inc. v. Helmuth, 29A04-1403-PL-121 (Ind. App. 8/28/14). A home health care employee signed a non-compete when he was hired, which restricted him from working for a competitor for two years after his employment ended. A year later, the employee was let go. He was required to turn in company equipment and property, his badge and keys. Ten days later, he was re-hired for the same position, as a patient advocate, for the same salary and benefits. He did not have to reapply or fill out new-hire paperwork. He did not sign a new non-compete. The patient advocate continued working for Nightingale for another three years.

After the employee’s employment with Nightingale ended, he began working for a competitor. Nightingale sued him for breach of his non-compete agreement. Nightingale argued that the original non-compete agreement was still in force, because his brief separation from the company earlier was revoked/voided when he was rehired 10 days later. However, the trial and appellate courts disagreed, holding that the break in the patient advocate’s employment triggered the running of the two-year non-competition clock from his agreement.

When an employer has to terminate employment, it should not rely on a previously signed non-competition agreement if it later re-hires the employee. A new agreement should be signed. A periodic review of employee files is recommended.

For more information regarding non-compete agreements and employment law, contact the Goosmann Law Firm at info@goosmannlaw.com or call 712-226-4000.

Photo Copyright: pressmaster / 123RF Stock Photo

Subscribe Our Blog

DISCLAIMER: The information in this blog post (“post”) is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect the current law in your jurisdiction. By visiting this website, blog, or post you understand that there is no attorney client relationship between you and the Goosmann Law Firm attorneys and website publisher. No information contained in this post should be construed as legal advice from Goosmann Law Firm, PLC, or the individual author, nor is it intended to be a substitute for legal counsel on any subject matter. No reader of this post should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any information included in, or accessible through, this Post without seeking the appropriate legal or other professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances at issue from a lawyer licensed in the recipient’s state, country or other appropriate licensing jurisdiction.