Tags: Firm News

PUBLIC STATEMENT OF THE GOOSMANN LAW FIRM

May 16, 2014. The Goosmann Law Firm is disappointed that the Iowa Supreme Court circumvented the jury’s findings and held the actual malice element had not been met in a political defamation case. “We hoped that this case would send a message to politicians that the public deserves truthful information about candidates for political office,” said Jeana Goosmann of Goosmann Law Firm. The firm is analyzing filing for certiorari in the United States Supreme Court.

View the Supreme Court Opinion HERE.

Subscribe Our Blog

DISCLAIMER: The information in this blog post (“post”) is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect the current law in your jurisdiction. By visiting this website, blog, or post you understand that there is no attorney client relationship between you and the Goosmann Law Firm attorneys and website publisher. No information contained in this post should be construed as legal advice from Goosmann Law Firm, PLC, or the individual author, nor is it intended to be a substitute for legal counsel on any subject matter. No reader of this post should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any information included in, or accessible through, this Post without seeking the appropriate legal or other professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances at issue from a lawyer licensed in the recipient’s state, country or other appropriate licensing jurisdiction.