NDAA Will Provide Consistency in the Application of State Laws Regarding Custody

The FY 2015 National Defense Authorization Act (“NDAA”) was recently signed into law by President Obama. This legislation provides a uniform national standard that prohibits state courts from using past, current, or future deployment against service members when making child custody determinations.

The intent behind the passage of a uniform national standard is to provide consistency in the application of state laws regarding custody decisions as it relates to military parents facing a deployment. According to Rep. Mike Turner, R-Ohio, the sponsor of the custody provisions in the NDAA, this legislation “ensures service members will not lose custody of their children because they have served or might deploy as part of their military service.”

The provisions regarding child custody issues contained in the NDAA amend the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act and will help prevent courts from permanently altering custody orders during a parent’s deployment. Additionally, the NDAA will require pre-deployment custody to be reinstated unless it is not in the best interest of the child.

For more information concerning service members about custody, visitation, support, and divorce, contact the Goosmann Law Firm at info@goosmannlaw.com or call 712-226-4000.

Subscribe Our Blog

DISCLAIMER: The information in this blog post (“post”) is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect the current law in your jurisdiction. By visiting this website, blog, or post you understand that there is no attorney client relationship between you and the Goosmann Law Firm attorneys and website publisher. No information contained in this post should be construed as legal advice from Goosmann Law Firm, PLC, or the individual author, nor is it intended to be a substitute for legal counsel on any subject matter. No reader of this post should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any information included in, or accessible through, this Post without seeking the appropriate legal or other professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances at issue from a lawyer licensed in the recipient’s state, country or other appropriate licensing jurisdiction.